Skip to main content
· 8/7/1901

In re Magid-Hope Silk Mfg. Co.

Citations

  • 110 F. 352
  • 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A plaintiff] is not bound by the class definitions proposed in its Amended Complaint, and the Court can consider [p]laintiff’s revised definitions . . . in its motion for class certification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.