D. Massachusetts· 5/3/1990
In Re MacDonald
Citations
- 114 B.R. 326
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5344
- 1990 WL 65708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- piercing the corporate veil in bankruptcy case to establish debtor as the equitable owner of corporate stock that ostensibly was owned by debtor’s father, and therefore finding stock subject to turnover order
- piercing the corporate veil in bankruptcy case to establish debtor as the equitable owner of corporate stock that ostensibly was owned by debtor's father, and therefore finding stock subject to turnover order
- the equitable powers of the bankruptcy court enable them to apply the My Bread and Pepsi-Cola analysis to pierce the corporate veil in order to attribute a non-debtor corporation’s assets or liabilities to the shareholders of the corporation
- property of the estate includes stock in which debtor owned equitable interest
- shareholder status not necessary in Massachusetts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Freedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Freeman v. Complex Computing Co.Second Circuit· 1997-08-07· cited 117×
- Fontana v. TLD Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-16· cited 97×
- Aoki v. Atto Corp. (In Re Aoki)First Circuit· 2005-04-04· cited 55×
- Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Hayes (In Re Hayes)First Circuit· 1999-01-29· cited 43×
- Buckley v. AbuzirAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-05-19· cited 25×
- Small v. Bottone (In Re Bottone)D. Massachusetts· 1997-06-09· cited 17×
- In Re Guyana Development Corp.S.D. Texas· 1994-05-11· cited 16×
- Freeman v. Complex Computing CompanySecond Circuit· 1997-08-07· cited 12×
- Shamban v. O'Brien (In Re O'Brien)D. Massachusetts· 1995-11-16· cited 10×
- Swenson v. Bushman Investment Properties, Ltd.D. Idaho· 2012-04-27· cited 4×
- United States v. Ken Intern. Co., Ltd.D. Nevada· 1995-05-05· cited 2×
- In re Bonilla MontalvoD. Puerto Rico· 1991-04-09· cited 1×
- Fontana v. TLD Builders, Inc. Correction posted 4/30/07Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-14
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 3,653×
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 1,643×
- My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1968-02-05· cited 301×
- Daniel Molerio v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationD.C. Circuit· 1984-11-30· cited 116×
- In the Matter of Avner Kauffman, Bankrupt. Morris T. Friedell v. Avner KauffmanSeventh Circuit· 1981-04-03· cited 75×
- In Re Prichard Plaza Associates Ltd. PartnershipD. Massachusetts· 1988-03-28· cited 63×
- Sacklow v. VecchioneE.D. New York· 1976-01-27· cited 53×
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,577 in Re Mario A. Espino and Maria Espino, Debtors. The Bank of Miami v. Mario A. Espino and Maria EspinoEleventh Circuit· 1986-12-22· cited 37×
- Cooney v. MontanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1964-02-11· cited 37×
- Penner v. Penner (In Re Penner)N.D. Indiana· 1989-05-31· cited 31×
- New World Marketing Corp. v. Garcia (In Re Garcia)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-07-20· cited 26×
- O'Hara v. O'HaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-05-14· cited 24×
- Levy v. Runnells (In Re Landbank Equity Corp. )E.D. Virginia· 1987-06-10· cited 21×
- Horizon House-Microwave, Inc. v. BAZZY BAZZYMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-12-09· cited 21×
- In Re 1438 Meridian Place, N. W., Inc.District of Columbia· 1981-11-12· cited 20×
- Bartlett Bank & Trust Co. v. Wolmer (In Re Wolmer)N.D. Illinois· 1986-01-08· cited 17×
- Teilhaber Manufacturing Corp. v. Hodge (In Re Hodge)D. Kansas· 1988-11-03· cited 16×
- Morrison v. Howard (In Re Howard)E.D. North Carolina· 1985-12-03· cited 15×
- In Re TureaudN.D. Oklahoma· 1985-01-10· cited 15×
- Rock v. RockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1941-04-26· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.