In re: M.A.C. & S.X.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he action taken by the accused must be with an intent to influence judicial or grand jury proceedings”
• holding that “[t]he action taken by the accused must be with an intent to influence judicial or grand jury proceedings”
• holding that “if the defendant lacks knowledge that his actions are likely to affect the judicial proceeding, he lacks the requisite intent to obstruct”
• holding that making false statements to an FBI agent was not obstruction of justice absent evidence that the declarant knew the statements would be provided to a grant jury
• holding that making false statements to an FBI agent was not obstruction of justice absent evidence that the declarant knew the statements would be provided to a grant jury
• holding that a defendant may be convicted of obstruction of justice “where the defendant acts with an intent to obstruct justice, but is foiled in some way”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).