In re M. J. B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even though the third Freeman factor weighs in defendant's favor, no one factor is controlling, so that conclusion does not direct the final conclusion
• affirming district court's decision to allow the victim to testify at trial about prior uncharged sexual conduct defendant committed against her
• finding allegations of prior sexual misconduct would be admissible to prove propensity under amended version of K.S.A. 60-455
• K.S.A. 21-4608 provides that sentences shall be served concurrently where judge fails to pronounce how they will be served
• victim’s prior molestation allegations against defendant would have been admissible propensity evidence in later prosecution for aggravated indecent liberties involving same victim
• victim's prior molestation allegations against defendant would have been admissible propensity 20 evidence in later prosecution for aggravated indecent liberties involving same victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).