In re Lynn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating a district court order denying a plaintiff's motion to compel because the denial “deprived [the plaintiff] of the 32 opportunity to find evidence that might support her argument that [the defendant’s] reasons for firing her were pretextuall[.]”
• finding error for district court to refuse to consider subsequent declaration
• “It was error for the district court to categorically refuse to consider [declarant’s] subsequent declaration; the sham issue doctrine does not go so far.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).