In Re Lupron Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that under the stream qf commerce plus theory, the defendant’s contact with the state were sufficient to show purposeful availment
• “The Rule requires plaintiffs to certify that to their knowledge, based on information that is ‘readily available,’ [the defendant] is not subject to the jurisdiction of any state court. This they have not done.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).