In re Lumber Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the crux of an issue decided by the Court is fact-dependent, the Court has not decided ‘a controlling question of law’ justifying immediate appeal
• “A possible impact on case strategy . . . is too intangible a repercussion on the progress of a case to justify certification of interlocutory appeal.”
• “A possible impact on case strategy . . . is too intangible a repercussion on the progress of a case to justify certification of interlocutory appeal.”
• “When the crux of an issue decided by the court is fact- 11 dependent, the court has not decided a ‘controlling question of law’ justifying 12 immediate appeal.”
• “The fact that this Circuit has not yet articulated a standard . . . does not convince the Court [that there is a substantial ground for a difference of opinion].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).