In Re Lukas K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• due process balancing under Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335, 96 S. Ct. 893, 47 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1976), is question of law subject to plenary review
• due process balancing under Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335, 96 S. Ct. 893, 47 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1976), is question of law subject to plenary review
• denial of request for continuance in parental termination proceeding was harmless when parent had ‘‘not identified on appeal any additional evidence or arguments that he could have presented if the trial court had granted his request’’
• trial court properly denied request for continuance in termination of parental rights proceeding when respondent father had ‘‘not identified on appeal any additional evidence or arguments that he could have presented if the trial court had granted his request’’
• respondent father gave no indication to trial court by offer of proof or otherwise as to additional evidence he would have presented or attempted to elicit from commissioner’s witnesses had he been given copy of transcript and continuance to respond to evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).