In re Lugaski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating as moot the part of the Court of Appeals’ judgment holding a resignation provision to be invalid because the defendant had resigned from office prior to the Court of Appeals’ decision
• “[T]he law has long been clear that there is no property interest in holding public office.”
• “the law has long been clear that there is no property interest in holding public office.”
• “[T]he law has long been clear that there is no property interest in holding public office.”
• “A dispute is moot if no controversy exists and any judgment on the matter would lack practical legal effect.”
• in which a majority of the Court agreed, as a matter of first impression, that a “bar-to-office” plea agreement violates public policy under the common law in certain circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).