In Re Lucent Technologies Inc., Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that class counsel had “hired experts to assist them in evaluating the merits of their claims and the risks of litigation”
• finding sufficient predominance in securities settlement class where plaintiffs at least relied upon fraud-on-the- market presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Varacallo v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
  D. New Jersey· 2005-02-15· cited 48×
• Schulte v. Fifth Third Bank
  N.D. Illinois· 2011-07-29· cited 20×
• In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 2012-03-30· cited 14×
• In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 2013-08-01· cited 14×
• In Re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-12-28· cited 4×
• Pollak v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC
  D. New Jersey· 2018-01-17· cited 4×