· 1/17/1995
In Re Lotus Development Corp. Securities Litigation
Citations
- 875 F. Supp. 48
- 31 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 688
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 708
- 1995 WL 40677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to stay discovery pending ruling on defendants’ motion to dismiss, court noted that “[u]nusual backlogs [in inventory] may reasonably be expected to lead to decreased sales”
- stating there is no automatic stay of discovery once a motion for a protective order has been filed
- “More colorfully put, the [advisory] committee set out to slay the twin dragons of cost and delay.”
- treating disclosure and discovery as distinct concepts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.