Skip to main content
· 1/17/1995

In Re Lotus Development Corp. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 875 F. Supp. 48
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 688
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 708
  • 1995 WL 40677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to stay discovery pending ruling on defendants’ motion to dismiss, court noted that “[u]nusual backlogs [in inventory] may reasonably be expected to lead to decreased sales”
  • stating there is no automatic stay of discovery once a motion for a protective order has been filed
  • “More colorfully put, the [advisory] committee set out to slay the twin dragons of cost and delay.”
  • treating disclosure and discovery as distinct concepts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.