In Re Lott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he impact on a judicial estoppel defense should not be the basis of a bankruptcy court’s decision of whether or not to reopen a bankruptcy case because the conflicting assertion did not occur in the bankruptcy court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In Re Rochester
  N.D. Georgia· 2004-04-06· cited 10×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aetna Life Insurance v. Haworth
  Supreme Court· 1937-03-01· cited 3,033×
• Southmark Corp. v. Trotter, Smith & Jacobs
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-03-15· cited 61×
• Wolfork v. Tackett
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-12-03· cited 26×
• Wolfork v. Tackett
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-01-08· cited 26×
• In Re Dewberry
  S.D. Georgia· 2001-08-30· cited 24×
• Jowers v. Arthur
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-07-12· cited 21×
• Dillard-Winecoff, LLC v. IBF Participating Income Fund
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-07-16· cited 12×
• Harper v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-30· cited 12×
• McBride v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-09-06· cited 9×