Skip to main content
· 3/23/2022

In Re: L.J.J., Petition of: H.A.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding contractual choice-of law-provision unenforceable because applying selected state's law would contravene fundamental policy of forum state
  • suggesting plaintiffs’ allegations on appeal could conceivably state claim under G. L. c. 93A if properly pleaded
  • reversing, after entry of final judgment, order allowing motion to compel arbitration and invalidating arbitration clause purporting to ban class action
  • allowing the plaintiffs to re-plead six years after commencement of this action
  • \we may consider any ground apparent on the record that supports the result reached in the trial court\
  • “ ‘[t]rade or commerce’ refers to transactions in a ‘business context,’ which, in turn, is ‘determined by the facts of each case’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.