Skip to main content
· 4/5/1926

In re Lindsborg Milling & Elevator Co.

Citations

  • 11 F.2d 998
  • 56 App. D.C. 401
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming court-ordered substitution of party in her individual capacity given Wells standard and in light of the court's simultaneous rulings; reversing denial of defendant's motion for summary judgment
  • discussing the qualified immunity analysis in the context of a deliberate indifference claim
  • Johnson v. Jones did not bar review of the case, even though the district court phrased its denial of qualified immunity in terms of the evidence supporting plaintiff's claim, because plaintiff's version of events did not state a claim for a constitutional violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.