In re: Linda K. Hanten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 37 C.F.R. § 1.153(a) “permits claim language, not just illus- tration alone” to identify the claimed article
• “[t]o define the scope of a design patent, we have traditionally focused on the figures 4 illustrated in the patent”
• “[W]e affirm the district court's grant of Home Expressions's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a plausible claim of design patent infringement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).