In Re Lichtenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• submitting materially inaccurate financial disclosure in the bankruptcy case itself, or both
• “most significant factor” to court was that debtor filed the case in response to a judgment, pending litigation, or collection action; there is an intent to avoid a large single debt
• “Debtor defiantly admitted at trial that his sole purpose in filing this bankruptcy is to avoid the debt he owes to Barbanel and that he would not have filed the case but for Barbanel’s collection efforts.”
• “Debtor defiantly admitted at trial that his sole purpose in filing this bankruptcy is to avoid the debt he owes to Barbanel and that he would not have filed the case but for Barbanel’s collection efforts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In Re Tallman
  N.D. Indiana· 2008-11-12· cited 4×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re David G. Zick, Debtor. Industrial Insurance Services, Inc. v. David G. Zick
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-05-03· cited 259×
• In Re Spagnolia
  W.D. Kentucky· 1995-09-05· cited 28×