In Re Liam M.
Syllabus
The circuit court determined that two grounds for termination of a mother's parental rights to her child had been proven by clear and convincing evidence but concluded that the petitioners failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the child's best interest. The petitioners appealed. Discerning no error, we affirm the circuit court's decision.
Judges: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- In Re ValentineTennessee Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 1,212×
- In Re Audrey S.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-11-07· cited 1,098×
- In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2016-01-29· cited 732×
- In re M.J.B.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-04-08· cited 730×
- Jones v. GarrettTennessee Supreme Court· 2002-12-30· cited 708×
- In Re Bernard T.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 702×
- In Re Angela E.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2010-02-16· cited 623×
- In Re: Kaliyah S.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 554×
- In Re Gabriella D.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2017-09-29· cited 399×
- Nash-Putnam v. McCloudTennessee Supreme Court· 1996-04-22· cited 316×
- Chiozza v. ChiozzaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2009-11-20· cited 242×
- In Re MarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-11-16· cited 234×
- In Re JACOBE M.J.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2013-12-05· cited 229×
- Nale v. RobertsonTennessee Supreme Court· 1994-02-18· cited 165×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.