Skip to main content
· 12/1/1992

In Re Lester D. Lane and Bonnie F. Lane, Debtors. Hurst Concrete Products, Inc. v. Lester D. Lane Bonnie F. Lane

Citations

  • 980 F.2d 601
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9577
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 16067
  • 27 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1724
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31302
  • 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1197
  • 1992 WL 348871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • filing a valid lis pendens was a transfer within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code, thus judgment creditor’s interest in property related back to filing of the lis pendens, which pre-dated the preference period
  • “Until judgment, [plaintiff’s] 22 interest [under the recorded lis pendens] may have been the 23 |
  • “The Bankruptcy Code does not require the attachment of a lien in order to perfect an interest.”
  • because the recording of the lis pendens operated to perfect the filer’s interest against bona fide purchasers, the recording was a transfer under § 547(e)(1)(A)
  • filing of a lis pendens constitutes perfection under § 547(e)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Goodwin, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.