· 12/1/1992
In Re Lester D. Lane and Bonnie F. Lane, Debtors. Hurst Concrete Products, Inc. v. Lester D. Lane Bonnie F. Lane
Citations
- 980 F.2d 601
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9577
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 16067
- 27 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1724
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31302
- 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1197
- 1992 WL 348871
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- filing a valid lis pendens was a transfer within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code, thus judgment creditor’s interest in property related back to filing of the lis pendens, which pre-dated the preference period
- “Until judgment, [plaintiff’s] 22 interest [under the recorded lis pendens] may have been the 23 |
- “The Bankruptcy Code does not require the attachment of a lien in order to perfect an interest.”
- because the recording of the lis pendens operated to perfect the filer’s interest against bona fide purchasers, the recording was a transfer under § 547(e)(1)(A)
- filing of a lis pendens constitutes perfection under § 547(e)(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Goodwin, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.