Skip to main content

In Re Leroy T.

Citations

  • 403 A.2d 1226
  • 285 Md. 508
  • 1979 Md. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statute prohibiting the possession of devices \commonly used ... for criminal use\ was unconstitutionally vague
  • holding that a statute prohibiting the possession of devices “commonly used ... for criminal use” was unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Orth and Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.