Skip to main content
· 7/23/1979

In Re Leroy T.

Citations

  • 403 A.2d 1226
  • 285 Md. 508
  • 1979 Md. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statute prohibiting the possession of devices \commonly used ... for criminal use\ was unconstitutionally vague
  • holding that a statute prohibiting the possession of devices “commonly used ... for criminal use” was unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Orth and Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.