Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 9/9/2008

In Re Lemma

Citations

  • 393 B.R. 299
  • 60 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 549
  • 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2302
  • 2008 WL 4174185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Court declines to look beyond section 101(8), into its legislative history to interpret its meaning, because the statute is unambiguous on its face.”
  • “There is no language in section 362(c)(3) that states or implies that when the stay terminates automatically with respect to the debtor by reason of his prior filings, the co-debtor stay terminates as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert E. Grossman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.