Skip to main content
· 5/11/2011

In Re Lehman Bros. Mortgage-Backed Securities

Citations

  • 650 F.3d 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that “strategic direction ... falls far short of showing a power to direct the primary violators’ management and policies”
  • finding no abuse of discretion where the “plaintiffs requested leave to amend without specifying what additional facts, if any, they might assert in a new pleading”
  • finding no abuse of discretion where the “plaintiffs requested leave to amend without specifying what additional facts, if any, they might assert in a new pleading”
  • finding no abuse of discretion in denying leave to amend where the “plaintiffs requested leave to amend without specifying what additional facts, if any, they might assert in a new pleading”
  • affirming dismissal with prejudice where “[i]n their briefs in opposition to the motions to dismiss, plaintiffs requested leave to amend without specifying what additional facts, if any, they might assert in a new pleading”
  • “Subprime mortgages are loans made to borrowers with poor credit histories, creating a high risk of default.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Cabranes, and Raggi, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.