In Re Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court refused to apply doctrine of judicial estoppel as to the number of creditors based on debtor’s pri- or testimony and gave the petitioning creditors 20 days to obtain an additional petitioning creditor
• court refused to apply doctrine of judicial estoppel as to the number of creditors based on debtor’s prior testimony and gave the petitioning creditors 20 days to obtain an additional petitioning creditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Bos
  N.D. Florida· 2016-03-11· cited 5×
• Heidkamp v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Heidkamp)
  M.D. Florida· 2005-08-26· cited 3×
• In re Zenga
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-01-17· cited 3×
• In re: Vincent Zenga
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-01-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chrysler Credit Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Charles M. Rebhan
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-04-21· cited 175×
• Schreiber v. Stephenson (In Re Emerson)
  D. New Hampshire· 1999-04-19· cited 13×
• Matter of Kucharek
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1987-10-30· cited 4×
• Hoult v. Hoult (In Re Hoult)
  M.D. Florida· 1999-02-26· cited 1×