In re Leary Avenue
Citations
- 77 Wash. 399
- 138 P. 8
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 913
Syllabus
<p>Municipal Corporations — Improvements — Assessments — Benepits — Apportionment—Appeal—Review op Assessment. Where, in providing for an improvement to he paid for by special assessment upon property specially benefited, tbe council provided that any part of tbe costs not properly assessed against benefited property shall be paid for from tbe general fund, tbe superior court on appeal from tbe assessment, has power to apportion tbe costs between tbe city and property owners, and is not bound by tbe apportionment of tbe eminent domain commission.</p> <p>Same — Appeal—Review—Presumptions. Upon an appeal from a judgment modifying an assessment by eminent domain commissioners, any presumption would be in favor of tbe judgment.</p>
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Shilshole AvenueWashington Supreme Court· 1915-05-18· cited 18×
- In re Eighth Avenue NorthwestWashington Supreme Court· 1914-01-24· cited 13×
- In re Boyer AvenueWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-27· cited 11×
- Stone-Easter, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1922-10-13· cited 8×
- Horton Investment Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1917-02-06· cited 8×
- Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1917-02-08· cited 8×
- In re Empire WayWashington Supreme Court· 1918-04-02· cited 1×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Seattle v. Meteor Land Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1908-09-24· cited 13×
- City of Spokane v. MilesWashington Supreme Court· 1913-04-04· cited 13×
- In re Condemnation Proceedings by City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1907-03-23· cited 12×
- City of Seattle v. Sylvester-Cowen Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1909-11-15· cited 12×
- Roe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1911-03-13· cited 10×
- Loeb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1907-11-12· cited 9×
- In re Pine StreetWashington Supreme Court· 1910-02-02· cited 8×
- City of Spokane v. CurtissWashington Supreme Court· 1912-01-10· cited 8×
- In re Pike StreetWashington Supreme Court· 1906-04-14· cited 7×
- City of Spokane v. GilbertWashington Supreme Court· 1910-12-29· cited 6×
- City of Seattle v. Galbraith-Bacon & Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1913-06-28· cited 5×
- In re Twelfth AvenueWashington Supreme Court· 1911-12-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.