In Re Leach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute does not require court to determine outcome of any dispute just its presence or absence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Booher Enterprises v. Eastown Auto Co. (In Re Eastown Auto Co.)
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-01-23· cited 55×
• In Re Norris
  W.D. Louisiana· 1995-06-15· cited 30×
• Sipple v. Atwood (In Re Atwood)
  S.D. Georgia· 1991-02-12· cited 29×
• In Re Caucus Distributors, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 1989-10-25· cited 28×
• In Re Gulf States Steel, Inc. of Alabama
  N.D. Alabama· 2002-09-27· cited 23×
• In Re Leach
  D. Kansas· 1989-07-21· cited 14×
• In Re Nargassans
  S.D. New York· 1989-07-19· cited 6×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Lough
  E.D. Michigan· 1986-02-24· cited 99×
• In the Matter of Royal G. Covey and Norma L. Covey, Individually and as Partners, D/B/A Covey Dodge, Bankrupts-Appellants
  Seventh Circuit· 1981-06-05· cited 81×
• In re Reid
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-10-01· cited 50×
• In Re Johnston Hawks, Ltd.
  D. Hawaii· 1985-05-23· cited 38×
• In Re Stroop
  D. Colorado· 1985-07-19· cited 32×
• In Re Garland Coal & Mining Co.
  W.D. Arkansas· 1986-07-18· cited 31×
• Matter of Busick
  N.D. Indiana· 1986-10-03· cited 20×
• In Re Cates
  S.D. Texas· 1986-05-08· cited 14×
• In Re B.B.S.I., Ltd.
  E.D. New York· 1988-01-19· cited 12×