Skip to main content
· 12/2/2013

In re Le Chabrier

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 718
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 579
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3330
  • 571 U.S. 1070
  • 2013 WL 5923405
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining zone of interests test not satisfied where the plaintiffs’ goals were likely to frustrate rather than further statutory objectives
  • determining zone of interests test not satisfied where the plaintiffs’ goals were likely to frustrate rather than further statutory objectives
  • “Unlike Article 21 III standing, however, ‘statutory standing’ does not implicate our subject-matter 22 jurisdiction.”
  • “Unlike Article 23 III standing, however, ‘statutory standing’ does not implicate our subject-matter 24 jurisdiction.”
  • “Unlike Article III standing . . . “statutory standing” does not implicate our subject-matter jurisdiction.” (citation omitted)
  • “Unlike Article III standing, however, ‘statutory standing’ does 23 not implicate our subject-matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.