· 12/2/2013
In re Le Chabrier
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 718
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 579
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3330
- 571 U.S. 1070
- 2013 WL 5923405
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8496
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining zone of interests test not satisfied where the plaintiffs’ goals were likely to frustrate rather than further statutory objectives
- determining zone of interests test not satisfied where the plaintiffs’ goals were likely to frustrate rather than further statutory objectives
- “Unlike Article 21 III standing, however, ‘statutory standing’ does not implicate our subject-matter 22 jurisdiction.”
- “Unlike Article 23 III standing, however, ‘statutory standing’ does not implicate our subject-matter 24 jurisdiction.”
- “Unlike Article III standing . . . “statutory standing” does not implicate our subject-matter jurisdiction.” (citation omitted)
- “Unlike Article III standing, however, ‘statutory standing’ does 23 not implicate our subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.