In re L.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Registrants argue that . . . they are entitled to have their Megan's Law status terminated because they were under the age of fourteen when their sex offenses were committed and are now over eighteen.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re State
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-04-24· cited 44×
• In the Matter of Registrant A.D.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2015-07-20· cited 18×
• In re G.H.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-08-06· cited 13×
• IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT G.H. IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT G.A. (ML-00200521, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE, AND ML-07130018, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED) (CONSOLIDATED)
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-08-06
• In the Matter of Registrant J.R.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2024-01-31

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dalglish
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-07· cited 114×
• In Re Registrant J.G.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-07-17· cited 74×
• Lemke v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1963-12-16· cited 56×
• Ford Motor Co. v. New Jersey Department of Labor & Industry
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1950-11-06· cited 55×
• State v. Burford
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2000-03-14· cited 24×
• Diodato v. Camden Cty. Park Comm'n
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-09-24· cited 21×
• Ford Motor Co. v. NJ Dept. of Labor & Industry
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1950-03-06· cited 17×
• Coyle v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-01-16· cited 15×
• State v. Vigilante
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-01-18· cited 7×