In re L.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “verbatim recitations of the testimony of each witness do not constitute findings of fact by the trial judge”
• reversing and remanding on this issue where the trial court’s order failed to satisfy the requirements of sections 7B-906(b)(1), (3), and (4)
• “ ‘verbatim recitations of the testimony of each witness do not constitute findings of fact by the trial judge’ ”
• construing predecessor statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-906(b) (2005)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: K.L. & R.E.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-07-05· cited 19×
• Stancill v. Stancill
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-06-16· cited 14×
• State v. Yates
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-16· cited 5×
• In re: J.A.K.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-03-06· cited 3×
• In Re LB
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-07-03
• In the Matter of Dsa
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2009-08-04
• In re C-R.D.G.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-09-04

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re P.L.P.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-09-06· cited 111×
• In re R.A.H.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-03-06· cited 53×
• In re S.W.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-02-07· cited 30×