In re Lawrence
Citations
- 69 Cal. 608
- 11 P. 217
- 1886 Cal. LEXIS 696
Syllabus
<p>Liquor License—Supervisors mat Impose—Collection of—Appointment of Person to Collect. — The board of supervisors of a county has power, under sections 11 and 12 of article 11 of the constitution, to regulate the sales of vinous and spirituous liquors within the county by the imposition of a license tax, and to provide for its collection; such power includes the authority to appoint a suitable person, such as the tax collector of the county, to collect the tax.</p> <p>Id.—Separate Licenses for County and City.—A person carrying on the business of a liquor dealer in a city within the county is not exempted from the payment of such a license tax duly levied by the board of supervisors by reason of the fact that he has paid a license tax of a similar kind in pursuance of an ordinance enacted by the municipal authorities of the city.</p>
Judges: Foote
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex parte MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-03-13· cited 25×
- County of Monterey v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-12-15· cited 15×
- City of Portland v. State BankOregon Supreme Court· 1923-04-10· cited 14×
- Traverso v. PEOPLE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP.California Court of Appeal· 1996-06-27· cited 11×
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. BarrettTennessee Supreme Court· 1934-01-27· cited 7×
- People v. DraperAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1933-05-20· cited 7×
- Traverso v. People ex rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-06-27· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.