In Re LaSpina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[r]e-garding payments based upon non compete agreements, the majority view is that these payments are not excluded as earnings for post petition services performed,” and collecting cases
• severance pay that debtor negotiated one week prior to filing for bankruptcy was not compensation for services performed post-petition and therefore was property of the bankruptcy estate
• severance pay that debtor negotiated one week prior to filing for bankruptcy was not compensation for services performed post-petition and therefore was property of the bankruptcy estate
• post-petition severance payments are estate property provided they are rooted in a pre-bankruptcy relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).