In Re LaSpina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[r]e-garding payments based upon non compete agreements, the majority view is that these payments are not excluded as earnings for post petition services performed,” and collecting cases
• severance pay that debtor negotiated one week prior to filing for bankruptcy was not compensation for services performed post-petition and therefore was property of the bankruptcy estate
• severance pay that debtor negotiated one week prior to filing for bankruptcy was not compensation for services performed post-petition and therefore was property of the bankruptcy estate
• post-petition severance payments are estate property provided they are rooted in a pre-bankruptcy relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David Longaker v. Boston Scientific Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-04-26· cited 26×
• Sikirica v. Wettach (In re Wettach)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-03-26· cited 7×
• In Re Jokiel
  N.D. Illinois· 2011-04-21· cited 6×
• Sikirica v. Wettach
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-06-03· cited 3×
• Murray v. 3M Co.
  E.D. Arkansas· 2018-03-13· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 1,643×
• Booth v. Vaughan (In Re Booth)
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-03-16· cited 49×
• In Re Carson
  S.D. Ohio· 1987-11-02· cited 30×
• In Re Phillips
  N.D. Ohio· 1984-11-23· cited 20×
• Johnson v. Taxel (In Re Johnson)
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-02-27· cited 20×
• In Re Edmonds
  E.D. Michigan· 2001-05-31· cited 16×
• In Re Hammond
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1983-11-14· cited 14×
• Rau v. Ryerson (In Re Ryerson)
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-06-08· cited 11×
• In Re Bartholomew
  S.D. Ohio· 1997-10-17· cited 9×
• In Re Dennison
  S.D. Florida· 1988-02-02· cited 9×
• In Re Alstad
  M.D. Florida· 2001-07-31· cited 2×