In Re Larios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting modification even though the additional collateral apparently had been liquidated prior to the bankruptcy filing
• finding support for this position from the legislative history showing the anti-modification provision was enacted to protect the lender whose only collateral is the traditional home mortgage
• “[I]n deciding whether the protection of 1322(b)(2) applies, there is no need to look beyond the language of the agreement. ...”
• burden is on the objecting creditors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).