Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 4/27/1999
In Re Lambert
Citations
- 993 S.W.2d 123
- 1999 WL 35531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating declaratory judgment action filed in different court, seeking to have default judgment declared invalid, as bill of review
- treating declaratory judgment action filed in different court, seeking to have default judgment declared invalid, as bill of review
- which Berwick concedes is a custody proceeding
- which Berwick concedes is a custody proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rickhoff, López, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re OatesTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-01-16· cited 66×
- In Re McCoyTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-16· cited 51×
- In the Interest of E.K.N.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2000-07-13· cited 46×
- Berwick v. WagnerTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-02-10· cited 40×
- In Re BurkTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-04-10· cited 38×
- Mantis v. ReszCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-12-09· cited 30×
- in the Interest of H.M.M, a ChildTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-06-06· cited 26×
- Cater v. United Services Automobile Ass'nTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-06-28· cited 24×
- In Re Calderon-GarzaTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2002-06-27· cited 22×
- In the GUARDIANSHIP OF V.A., a MinorTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2012-05-16· cited 22×
- Consford v. ConsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-07-06· cited 21×
- Hall v. Diamond Shamrock Refining Co., LPTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-05-10· cited 19×
- In the Interest of E.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-03· cited 7×
- in the Interest of D.I.P.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2013-10-09· cited 1×
- In Re HMMTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-06-06
- In Re EKNCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-07-13
- In Re ErTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-03-03
- Lee A. Hughes Custom Homes, Inc. D/B/A Maverick Homes v. Robert and Jackie ShowsTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-05-29
- in the Interest of B.G.A., a Minor ChildTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-04-02
- in Re: Adam Lopez, RelatorTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-12-06
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 8,808×
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court· 1993-05-05· cited 5,047×
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court· 1998-05-08· cited 1,828×
- Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court· 1976-07-14· cited 594×
- Tilton v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 503×
- Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court· 1979-05-23· cited 469×
- Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court· 1997-04-18· cited 272×
- In Re Union Pacific Resources Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-07-03· cited 242×
- Dikeman v. SnellTexas Supreme Court· 1973-01-24· cited 215×
- Austin Independent School District v. Sierra ClubTexas Supreme Court· 1973-05-09· cited 174×
- Ybarra v. Texas Department of Human ServicesTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-12-16· cited 130×
- In the Interest of S.A.V.Texas Supreme Court· 1992-10-21· cited 107×
- Geary v. PeavyTexas Supreme Court· 1994-06-22· cited 92×
- Worden v. WordenTexas Supreme Court· 1949-11-02· cited 62×
- Durham v. BarrowTexas Supreme Court· 1980-05-21· cited 52×
- Arteaga v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory ServicesTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-07-17· cited 47×
- Rogers v. SearleCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-01-30· cited 44×
- White v. BlakeTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1993-07-26· cited 38×
- Stubbs v. WeathersbyOregon Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 32×
- Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-02-01· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.