In Re Lamar Dewsnup and Aletha Dewsnup, Debtors. Lamar Dewsnup, Aletha Dewsnup v. Louis L. Timm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \ 'it is obvious that Congress did not intend to permit a debtor to redeem his real property through the use of [sec.] 506(d)' \ (quoting In re Maitland, 61 Bankr. 130, 135 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1986))
• describing Lindsey as having \addressed questions which are tangentially related\ to the issue before the Tenth Circuit
• abandoned property “reverts to the debtor and stands as if no bankruptcy petition was filed”
• abandoned property “reverts to the debtor and stands as if no bankruptcy petition was filed”
• aff'd by Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S. Ct. 773, 116 L. Ed. 2d 903 (1992); superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Gibbons v. Opechee Distribs. (In re Gibbons), 164 B.R. 717 (D. N.H. 1993)
• bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate claims regarding abandoned property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).