In re Lakeland Transp. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Generally, standing to quash a non-party subpoena exists where the [moving party] asserts a legitimate privacy interest in the information sought.”
• “[C]ourts within the Second Circuit have recognized that [b]ecause of the direct negative effect that disclosures of disputes with past employers can have on present employment, subpoenas in this context, if warranted at all, should be used only as a last resort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).