Skip to main content
· 5/1/2003

In Re L. Darrell Bevan Patricia F. Bevan, Debtors. L. Darrell Bevan Patricia F. Bevan v. Socal Communications Sites, LLC

Citations

  • 327 F.3d 994
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 4823
  • 91 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2106
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8284
  • 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 81
  • 2003 WL 1989624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[e]quitable subrogation is generally appropriate where (1) the subrogee made 18 the payment to protect his or her own interest, [and] (2
  • appeal from order overruling claim 27 objection not moot because of potential preclusive effect that 28 order might have in future litigation
  • appeal from order overruling 25 claim objection not moot because of potential preclusive effect that order might have in future litigation
  • appeal from order overruling claim 27 objection not moot because of potential preclusive effect that 28 order might have in future litigation
  • appeal from order overruling 14 claim objection not moot because of potential preclusive effect that order might have in future litigation
  • “The allowance . . . of ‘a claim in bankruptcy 13 is binding and conclusive on all parties or their privies, and 14 being in the nature of a final judgment, furnishes a basis for a 15 plea of res judicata.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Fernandez, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.