In re L. Boyer's Sons Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \a defendant must show that the core of the codefendant's defense is so irreconcilable with the core of his own defense that the acceptance of the codefendant's theory by the jury precludes acquittal of the defendant\
• noting that \a defendant must show that the core of the codefendant's defense is so irreconcilable with the core of his own defense that the acceptance of the co-defendant's theory by the jury precludes acquittal of the defendant\
• reasoning that the “defendant must show that the core of the codefendant’s defense is so irreconcilable with the core of his own defense that the acceptance of the codefen- dant’s theory by the jury precludes acquittal of the defen- dant”
• rejecting defendant’s conjecture that codefendant, who declined to assert his Fifth Amendment right in a joint trial, would have exercised his Fifth Amendment right had they been tried separately
• \[A] defendant must show that the core of the codefendant's defense is so irreconcilable with the core of his own defense that the acceptance of the codefendant's theory by the jury precludes acquittal of the defendant.\
• “We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision denying a motion to sever trials.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).