Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a per sonal guarantee was new value where the creditor would not have provided additional funds without the guarantee
• discussing whether a post-petition event can qualify as new value under Section 547(c)(1), Cowen J. dissenting
• rejecting earmarking where “record does not reflect the existence of an agreement [between the new creditor and debtor] that the funds be used to pay a specified antecedent debt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).