In re Kudisch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney who accepted retainer fee, conducted no work on client’s behalf, and failed to reimburse unearned fee until after client complained to grievance committee violated DR 1-102(A)(4)
• by failing to respond to inquiries from Ghent’s family, attorney violated DR 6-101(A)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Anschell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-07-15· cited 19×
• In Re Saghir
  S.D. New York· 2009-07-08· cited 2×
• In re Kudisch
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-07-10

Other cases named In re Kudisch

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In re Kudisch
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-07-10
• In re Kudisch
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-07-10
• In re Kudisch
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1968-07-18
• In re Kudisch
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-11-26