In Re Krohn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• substantial abuse indicated where the ‘debtor was spending $700 each month to provide food for a family of two
• substantial abuse indicated where the debtor’s family of two spent, in the first three months after he entered bankruptcy, $256 for gasoline
• substantial abuse indicated where the debtor's non-debtor spouse had several credit cards in her own name that were not included in the bankruptcy
• substantial abuse indicated where the debtor was supporting a family of two on a net monthly income of $4,015
• substantial abuse indicated where the debtor had exhibited a consistent pattern of living beyond his means
• substantial abuse indicated where the debtor reaffirmed a large bank loan in exchange for a commitment by the bank to finance the building, post-petition, of a new, larger home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Wegner
  D. Minnesota· 1988-10-21· cited 26×
• Matter of Ploegert
  N.D. Indiana· 1988-11-22· cited 14×
• In Re Krohn
  N.D. Ohio· 1988-05-12· cited 14×
• In Re Ragan
  N.D. Ohio· 1994-07-29· cited 8×
• In Re Andrus
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-12-13· cited 8×
• In Re Laman
  N.D. Texas· 1998-04-08· cited 4×
• In Re Martinez
  N.D. Ohio· 1994-07-29· cited 2×
• In re Warfield
  S.D. Ohio· 1988-01-05· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Grant
  N.D. Ohio· 1985-07-22· cited 77×
• In Re Edwards
  S.D. New York· 1985-07-05· cited 46×
• In Re Mastroeni
  S.D. New York· 1985-12-20· cited 20×
• In Re Newsom
  D. North Dakota· 1987-01-14· cited 6×