In re Kristoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the lessor owed a duty to warn the lessee’s employee — who operated the equipment at issue — of “potential defects” in equipment rented and serviced by the lessee
• finding that a lessor of construction equipment owed a duty of care to one of the lessee’s employees that operated the equipment “arising out of [the defendant-lessor’s] status as a repairer of the equipment it provided”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).