In Re Kristen C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the state’s argument that “the order had the rehabilitative purpose of holding juvenile accountable for her own aetions[.]” (emphasis added)
• considering the statutory scheme for juvenile restitution the court noted that “[t]he end result of the statutory scheme is not unfair punishment, but rather accountability for unlawful conduct.” (emphasis added)
• order requiring juvenile to pay $6,000 in restitution three days before her eighteenth birthday was not punitive in nature when it made the victim whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).