In Re Krebs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a panel may not overrule precedent on the basis that our sister circuits have decided the issue contrary to that precedent or because we are no longer persuaded by its reasoning
• “A panel of this Court may reevaluate the holding of a prior panel which conflicts with intervening Supreme Court precedent.”
• “A panel of this Court may reevaluate the holding of a prior panel which conflicts.with intervening Supreme Court precedent.”
• “A panel of this Court may reevaluate the holding of a prior panel which conflicts with intervening Supreme Court precedent.” (citations omitted)
• “A panel of this Court may reevaluate the holding of a prior panel which conflicts with intervening Supreme Court precedent.”
• “A panel of this Court may reevaluate the holding of a prior panel which conflicts with intervening Supreme Court precedent.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).