In re Kramer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding disbarment appropriate “especially since [Kramer’s misconduct] is likely to continue due to respondent’s evident imperviousness to sanctions and his indifference to the consequences of his actions”
• “Over-all, the evidence presented at the hearing demonstrates that respondent has shown neither remorse nor self-control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Steven Kramer
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-03-06· cited 49×
• In re Heller
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-06-24· cited 15×
• Matter of Frelix
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-10-22· cited 2×
• In re Zweig
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-05-01

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• International Mining Co., Inc. v. Allen & Co., Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1983-06-11· cited 30×
• LeMaster v. Bull
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-03-06· cited 10×
• Silverman v. Weil
  District of Columbia· 1987-05-19· cited 8×
• In re Evangelista
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-09-16· cited 8×
• Giordano v. Witzer
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-03-11· cited 7×
• In re Kramer
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-10-16· cited 7×
• In re Mason
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-01-26· cited 3×
• In re Kramer
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-10-14· cited 2×