In Re Kostenblatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the municipal panel could not enforce requirements that were not express conditions of a conditional use permit
• finding that party could not raise for the first time in a Rule 59(e
• noting that enforcement of requirements of bylaws is not collateral attack on permit
• zoning permit need not identify all applicable zoning requirements for those requirements to be applicable and enforceable
• rejecting argument that discussion at ZBA hearing, including oral representations by applicant, be considered as findings, and ruling that conditions must be expressly stated in the permit to be binding
• “It is an unnecessary and unreasonable burden to impose on zoning boards the duty to state all potentially applicable zoning requirements on every permit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).