Skip to main content

Citations

  • 75 A.3d 224
  • 2013 WL 5037774
  • 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that sufficiency of evidence ―must in the end be assessed in light of the evidence taken as a whole,‖ not on ―the weight of various pieces of evidence in isolation‖
  • finding evidence of neglect “insufficient” where evidence of parent’s delusional disorder was unaccompanied by evidence of “how likely it actually was that [potential] harms would befall” the child
  • requiring, in context of neglect finding based on mental incapacity of parent, that District “demonstrate the existence of a nexus between a parent’s [ ] mental incapacity and an inability to provide proper parental care”
  • in a neglect case, there must be “a nexus between a parent’s [] mental incapacity and an inability to provide proper parental care” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)
  • evidence of what “could happen to a child . . . of a parent . . . suffering from a delusional disorder” too speculative to support a finding of neglect of the child at issue
  • two medical experts testified, but evidence of nexus to neglect deemed insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Belson, McLeese, Washington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.