Skip to main content
· 8/8/1991

In Re Klenosky

Citations

  • 130 B.R. 132
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11283
  • 1991 WL 155960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the continued viability of In re Gusam Restaurant is called into question by the 1986 amendment to section 105(a) of the Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bartels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.