Skip to main content
· 2/16/1996

In Re Klein Sleep Products, Inc., Debtor. Nostas Associates v. Bernard W. Costich, Chapter 11 Trustee, and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

Citations

  • 78 F.3d 18
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2511
  • 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that under Chapter 11 the “same priority'' is given to expenses from assumed prepetition leases as new postpetition leases
  • discussing consistency of treatment of claims arising from rejection of assumed contracts under Bankruptcy Code and former Bankruptcy Act
  • expressing the view that the business-judgment standard under 11 U.S.C. § 365(a) and the test for granting administrative expense - 26 - priority to post-petition liabilities under 11 U.S.C. § 503(b) are substantially equivalent
  • a lessor under an assumed lease does not lose its priority the moment the deal turns sour and the assumed lease becomes unprofitable
  • bankruptcy court required to determine that postpetition contract is in best interest of estate to justify administrative expense priority
  • “Failure to appear for trial … prejudices an adversary and 19 interferes with the court’s docket about as much as any procedural default can.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Kearse, Calabresi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.