In re Kinoshita & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the issuance of a preliminary injunction in such a case for an abuse of the trial court’s “broad discretionary powers”
• requiring the party seeking a preliminary injunction in such a case to show (1
• order continuing a motion to dissolve a TRO did not constitute a de facto denial of that motion, and accordingly, the order was not appealable under Rule 307(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).