In re King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Court believes that the National and Local Standards intended to limit the automobile ownership expense to that associated with the financing or acquisition of a vehicle.”
• “[T]he Court believes that the National and Local Standards intended to limit the automobile ownership expense to that associated with the financing or acquisition of a vehicle.”
• “[T]he Court is concerned that if the ownership deduction was available to a debtor with any type of automobile lien, future debtors would only be encouraged to take out de minimis title liens prior to seeking relief under the Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Sires
  S.D. Georgia· 2014-06-04· cited 6×
• In re Lopez
  E.D. California· 2017-08-30· cited 5×
• Feagan v. Townson
  N.D. Georgia· 2016-09-06· cited 2×
• In re Traylor
  D. Utah· 2019-01-10· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-11· cited 410×