In Re Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that in order for hearsay to be admitted under the excited-utterance exception as a reliable piece of evidence, the declarant must have personally made the observation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dame
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1985-02-20· cited 25×
• In Re Daniel
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-02-04· cited 17×
• State v. St. Jean
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-12-20· cited 15×
• State v. Willie Washington
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2018-06-29· cited 10×
• State v. Lead Industries Assoc.
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2007-02-26

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jalette
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1978-01-18· cited 119×
• State v. Mancini
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1971-03-10· cited 68×
• Watson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 66×
• Johnson v. Newell
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-01-13· cited 44×
• State v. Franklin
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-04-23· cited 39×
• State v. Vaccaro
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1973-01-19· cited 33×
• State v. Nordstrom
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-08-09· cited 29×
• Ungefug v. D'AMBROSIA
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-04-12· cited 19×
• State v. Poulin
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1980-06-25· cited 17×
• People v. Hill
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1965-06-08· cited 8×
• Warfield v. Shell Oil Company
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-07-15· cited 5×