Skip to main content
· 8/5/2022

in Re Kenneth R. Sowell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “publicly assisted construction of buildings for private use” was not for public use because economic development was secondary purpose
  • describing economic development as an incidental, rather than primary benefit, of a private construction project
  • relying on case law related to the Miller Act to determine the definition of “public work” under § 49-41
  • “While the cases ... have identified various factors that are used in determining whether a particular construction project qualified as a public work ... no one factor is determinative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.